1. Summary
This week, our team discussed a variety of instructional strategies including:
-Tiering assignments
-Independent learning for G/T students
-Creating opportunities for rigor
-Think Pair Share
-E-Word Walls
-Graphic Organizers
-KWL
-Jigsaw
The second question discussed brought up some interesting points about situations that where implementing these research-based strategies may fail. Often, as educators, we learn a new strategy in professional development and are eager to try it out on our students. As wonderful as they sound in an adult learning environment, they don’t always translate to the classroom, because not every classroom is identical.
2. Research
These thoughts led me to research why instructional strategies may sometimes fail.
1. In this report on failing schools, the author completed a comprehensive study of many different types of schools and the interventions they were trying to implement. He discovered “among the 17 intervention types reviewed, there was no specific strategy that resulted in compelling evidence that it is superior to other interventions in terms of effectiveness” (Brady 2003).
Brady, R. The Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, (2003). Can failing schools be fixed?. Retrieved from website: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED498798
2. This article examines “scientifically-based” reading intervention programs and recommends how to spot ineffective ones. She outlines the difference between ineffective reading strategies (such as use of memorization, picture cues, and contextual guessing for teaching word recognition), and the types of methods that mark a successful reading program, such as “support reading comprehension by focusing on a deep understanding of topic and theme rather than just a set of strategies and gimmicks” (Moats, 2007).
Moats, L. (2007). Whole-language high jinks: How to tell when "scientifically-based reading instruction" isn't . Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED498005
3. This article examines Chicago public schools and how strategies that exhibit coherence produce the best and most consistent results. With so many different school improvement strategies in place, educators and decisionmakers want to know what the best methods are. Unfortunately, as we have discovered, there is no magic formula. If there was, there would not be an education crisis in America.
Newmann, F., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. Consortium on Chicago School Research, (2001). School instructional program coherence: Benefits and challenges. improving chicago's schools. Retrieved from website: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED451305
3. Recommendation
I recommend scanning the first report, available at http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED498798
The report refers to No Child Left Behind often and the implications of this research on failing schools and interventions. When this report was published, over 4 million children were attending over 8,000 failing public schools in America.
4. Questions to consider
What interventions have you seen work first-hand? Which ones have failed?
What do you think about the importance of consistency in implementation?